Lab Tests Verify LPAC as Viable Choke System for MPD/UBD | Schlumberger Products
Case Study
Location
United States, North America, Onshore
Details

Challenge: No system existed for controlling low well pressures in MPD/UBD applications.

Solution: M-I SWACO launched an R&D effort to develop a specialized choke control system for MPD/UBD.

Results: The result of the R&D project was the LOW PRESSURE AUTOCHOKE CONSOLE (LPAC), which was verfified in lab tests at Louisiana State University System based on AUTOCHOKE technology.

Lab Tests Verify LPAC as Viable Choke System for MPD/UBD

The result of the R&D project was the LOW PRESSURE AUTOCHOKE console

The Situation

M-I SWACO launched an R&D effort to  create a specialized choke control system for Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD) and  Underbalanced Drilling (UBD) applications.  These applications generally require the control of lower pressures within a tight fluctuation window.

The Solution

The result of the investigation was the  LOW PRESSURE AUTOCHOKE CONSOLE (LPAC). The new technology is  based on the  existing AUTOCHOKE system.  The LPAC provides  clients a simplified, technologically advanced, and cost -effective method to control the relatively low well pressures seen in MPD and UBD applications. The LPAC was developed to deliver a cost-effective  solution for controlling back pressure on wells lower than 1500 psi within an operating window of +/- 50 psi.

The Results

M-I SWACO conducted multiple yard tests of the LPAC at Louisiana State University’s Petroleum Engineering Research and Technology Transfer Laboratory.  The results showed the technology was  able to consistently manage pressure on the casing to within +/- 50 psi while simulating the pump ramp up and ramp down conditions seen regularly on wells during connections. 

The Details

This graph shows the results of a step test performed using Electronic Control with third-party input sending new set points at a range from 50 psi to 1200 psi to the LPAC.  The test was carried out  on the LSU short well of 5280 ft  (1609 m) and the pump running at 60 gpm.  An offset of approximately  20 psi is noted between the Set Point Pressure (SPP) and the Casing Pressure (CSP). This offset exhibits hysteresis with CSP lagging the SPP. The CSP  consistently is lower than the SPP on ascending pressures changes and higher on descending pressure changes. While this behavior is attributed to the mechanics of the AUTOCHOKE, it  is superior to the responsiveness of other chokes in the market. The SPP had a consistent ramp up and overshoot of around 20 – 30 psi during each increasing step change and then would settle down to approximately the Choke A Setpoint value. The reverse was true on the descending side.

Lab Tests Verify LPAC as Viable Choke System for MPD/UBD

Share This